Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Guglielmin v Trescowthick (No.4) [2005] FCA 140 ELEANOR GUGLIELMIN v ADAM JOHN TRESCOWTHICK, JOHN MAURICE PATTEN, ROSS GRAHAM OAKLEY, ROBERT DAVID MATTINGLY, ROGER ANDREW CURTIS & MARK CHARLES TRESCOWTHICK SAD 153 of 2002 MANSFIELD J 25 FEBRUARY 2005 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 153 OF 2002
BETWEEN: ELEANOR GUGLIELMIN
APPLICANT
AND: ADAM JOHN TRESCOWTHICK
FIRST RESPONDENT
JOHN MAURICE PATTEN
SECOND RESPONDENT
ROSS GRAHAM OAKLEY
THIRD RESPONDENT
ROBERT DAVID MATTINGLY
FOURTH RESPONDENT
ROGER ANDREW CURTIS
FIFTH RESPONDENT
MARK CHARLES TRESCOWTHICK
SIXTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 FEBRUARY 2005
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The costs of and incidental to the first respondent's notice of motion dated 10 October 2002 and filed on 16 October 2002 be costs in the cause. 2. The costs of and incidental to the second to fifth respondents' notice of motion dated 15 October 2002 and filed on 17 October 2002 be costs in the cause. 3. The costs of and incidental to the sixth respondent's notice of motion dated 14 October 2002 and filed on 21 October 2002 be costs in the cause.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 153 OF 2002
BETWEEN: ELEANOR GUGLIELMIN
APPLICANT
AND: ADAM JOHN TRESCOWTHICK
FIRST RESPONDENT
JOHN MAURICE PATTEN
SECOND RESPONDENT
ROSS GRAHAM OAKLEY
THIRD RESPONDENT
ROBERT DAVID MATTINGLY
FOURTH RESPONDENT
ROGER ANDREW CURTIS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate