Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NSI Dental Pty Ltd v The University of Melbourne [2005] FCA 144 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – patent dispute - application to amend particulars of invalidity – hearing date only weeks away – prejudice to respondent – relevance of principles of case management – application granted - hearing dates vacated COSTS – indemnity costs Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Tyco Electronics Pty Limited [2002] FCAFC 315 cited Aktiebolaget Hassle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2002] 212 CLR 411 cited Gambro Pty Limited v Fresenius Medical Care Australia Pty Limited [2004] FCA 323 cited State of Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 applied NSI DENTAL PTY LTD (ACN 108 218 104) v THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE & ANOR N1033 of 2004
TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 28 FEBRUARY 2005
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1033 OF 2004
BETWEEN: NSI DENTAL PTY LTD
ACN 108 218 104
APPLICANT
AND: THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE
FIRST RESPONDENT
RECALDENT PTY LTD
ACN 105 290 006
SECOND RESPONDENT
BETWEEN: THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE
FIRST CROSS CLAIMANT
RECALDENT PTY LTD
ACN 105 290 006
SECOND CROSS CLAIMANT
AND: NSI DENTAL PTY LTD
ACN 108 218 104
FIRST CROSS RESPONDENT
TOPACAL PTY LTD
ACN 058 515 656
SECOND CROSS RESPONDENT
NZPH AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
ACN 101 632 697
THIRD CROSS RESPONDENT
PACIFIC BIOLINK PTY LTD
ACN 075 264 112
FOURTH CROSS RESPONDENT
PHOSCAL HOLDINGS PTY LTD
ACN 091 503 374
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate