Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WABY v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 209 MIGRATION – judicial review – procedural fairness – adverse findings as to credibility of applicant and witness – whether failure of procedural fairness by failure to put proposed findings to applicant – findings going to characterisation and non-acceptance of applicant's evidence – no want of procedural fairness in failing to put those characterisations and conclusions to the applicant before reaching a decision Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
WABY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FMCA 61 cited WABY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1091 cited Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 cited WABY v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL and THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS WAD206 of 2004 FRENCH J 8 MARCH 2005 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W206 OF 2004
BETWEEN: WABY
APPLICANT
AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 MARCH 2005
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W206 OF 2004
BETWEEN: WABY
APPLICANT
AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE: 8 MARCH 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate