Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nock v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2005] FCA 217
SOCIAL SECURITY – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – application for Partnered Parenting Payments (PPP) and Austudy rejected – applicants' assets exceeded limit prescribed by value assets test – method of calculating assets – charge or encumbrance over property – whether amount of charge or encumbrance to be calculated at time of application – whether value of applicants' assets to be reduced by full amount potentially owing under charge or encumbrance.
Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 500Q, 573, 573B, 1118, 1121
Sibbles v Highfern Pty Ltd (1987) 164 CLR 214 cited WALTER NOCK and PUI YING NOCK v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES WAD 227 of 2003 LANDER J 11 MARCH 2005 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD227 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM THE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR G A BARTON
BETWEEN: WALTER NOCK AND PUI YING NOCK
APPLICANTS
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 MARCH 2005
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicants pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD227 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM THE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR G A BARTON
BETWEEN: WALTER NOCK AND PUI YING NOCK
APPLICANTS
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate