Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kyocera Mita Australia Pty Ltd v Mitronics Corporation Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 242 KYOCERA MITA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v MITRONICS CORPORATION PTY LTD & ORS V 605 OF 2002 STONE J 15 MARCH 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY V 605 OF 2002
BETWEEN: KYOCERA MITA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
APPLICANT/FIRST CROSS-RESPONDENT
AND: MITRONICS CORPORATION PTY LTD
FIRST RESPONDENT/CROSS CLAIMANT
KYOCERA CORPORATION
SECOND RESPONDENT
KYOCERA MITA CORPORATION
THIRD RESPONDENT
MITA COPIERS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)
SECOND CROSS-RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 FEBRUARY 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
DATE OF PUBLICATION OF REASONS: 15 MARCH 2005
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Paragraphs 1(j), 1(k) and 2(b) of the applicant's notice of motion filed on 28 January 2005 be stood over for determination at a later date;
2. Subject to the orders made with the consent of the parties on 15 February 2005, the applicant's notice of motion be otherwise dismissed;
3. Costs of the applicant's notice of motion be reserved;
4. The time under O 52 r 10(2)(b) of the Federal Court Rules to file and serve an application for leave to appeal from this judgment be extended to 22 March 2005.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY V 605 OF 2002
BETWEEN: KYOCERA MITA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate