Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZBOL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 260 SZBOL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs N 1976 of 2004 JACOBSON J 11 MARCH 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1976 OF 2004
BETWEEN: SZBOL
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: JACOBSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 MARCH 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. No order as to costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1976 OF 2004
BETWEEN: SZBOL
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: JACOBSON J
DATE: 9 MARCH 2005
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1. This is an application for extension of time to file and serve an application for leave to appeal against the orders and judgment of Federal Magistrate Driver, dated 27 October 2004. 2. The matter was listed for hearing on Wednesday, 9 March 2005. Mr Angelovski, solicitor, appeared on that occasion for the applicant and asked for a short adjournment. I adjourned the matter to today. Mr Angelovski appears this morning and informs me that the applicant does not wish to pursue the application for leave to appeal, which is withdrawn. 3. In those circumstances I think the appropriate order to make is that the application be dismissed. 4. Mr Carter, for the Minister, seeks an order for costs. Although ordinarily costs follow the event, I think that in the circumstances of this case it is appropriate for me to exercise my discretion to make no order as to costs. 5. Mr Angelovski appeared on 9 March 2005 and informed me that he'd only very recently been approached for advice, and said on that occasion that it may well be that the applicant would not proceed with the application after he'd had the opportunity to be advised on the matter. 6. As I've said, the application was withdrawn this morning, and I think that in all the circumstances it is appropriate to make no order as to costs of the application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate