Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PhotoCure ASA v Queen's University at Kingston [2005] FCA 344
PATENTS – invention claimed for a method of detection and treatment of malignant and non-malignant lesions by photochemotherapy – whether patent invalid on grounds of obviousness, lack of novelty, lack of sufficiency and best method, lack of definition or lack of fair basis – whether the patent is infringed in substance by a variant that does not have a material effect on the way the invention works – consideration of the principles to be applied in determining a claim of infringement in substance when no claim is infringed on a textual approach to construction of the patent
Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 7, 40(2)(a), 40(2)(b), 117, 138(3)(b) and 234 and Sch 1 Patents Act 1952 (Cth) s 100(1)(e)
Amadio Pty Ltd v Henderson (1998) 81 FCR 149 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Tyco Electronics Pty Ltd (2002) 56 IPR 248 NV Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken v Mirabella International Pty Ltd (1993) 44 FCR 239 Aktiebolaget Hässle v Alphapharm Pty Limited (2002) 212 CLR 411 General Tire & Rubber Company v The Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Ltd [1972] RPC 457 The Leonardis v Sartas No 1 Pty Ltd (1996) 67 FCR 126 ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd v Lubrizol Corporation Inc (1999) 45 IPR 577 Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd (1980) 144 CLR 253 Aktiebolaget Hässle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2000) 51 IPR 375 Aktiebolaget Hässle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (1999) 44 IPR 593 Williams Advanced Materials, Inc v Target Technology Company LLC [2004] FCA 1405 Nescor Industries Group Pty Ltd v Miba Pty Ltd (1997) 150 ALR 633 Chiron Corporation v Organon Teknika Ltd (No 3) [1994] FSR 202 ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd v The Lubrizol Corporation Inc (2000) 106 FCR 214 Meyers Taylor Pty Ltd v Vicarr Industries Ltd (1977) 137 CLR 228 R D Werner & Co Inc v Bailey Aluminium Products Pty Ltd (1989) 25 FCR 565 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v FH Faulding & Co Ltd (2000) 97 FCR 524 Nicaro Holdings Pty Ltd v Martin Engineering Co (1990) 91 ALR 513 Hills v Evans (1862) 31 LJ Ch 457 Olin Corporation v Super Cartridge Co. Pty Ltd (1977) 180 CLR 236 Arrow Pharmaceuticals Ltd v Merck & Co Inc (2004) 213 ALR 182 Rescare Ltd v Anaesthetic Supplies Pty Ltd (1992) 111 ALR 205 Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Limited v Arico Trading International Pty Limited (2001) 207 CLR 1 Innovative Agriculture Products Pty Ltd v Cranshaw (1996)35 IPR 643 Electric & Musical Industries Ltd v Lissen Ltd [1938] 4 All ER 221 Welch Perrin and Company Pty Ltd v Worrel (1961) 106 CLR 588 Kauzal v Lee (1936) 58 CLR 670 Raleigh Cycle Co Ltd v H Miller & Co Ltd [1948] 1 All ER 308 General Steel Industries Inc v State of New South Wales (1967) 40 ALJR 464 Windsurfing International Inc v Petit [1984] 2 NSWLR 196 Philpott v Hanbury (1885) 2 RPC 33 Rose Street Foundry and Engineering Company Ld v India Rubber Gutta Percha and Telegraph Works Company Ld (1929) 46 RPC 294 Cincinnati Grinders (Inc) v B.S.A. Tools Ld (1931) 48 RPC 33 Société des Usines Chimiques Rhône-Poulenc v Commissioner of Patents (1958) 100 CLR 5 F. Hoffman-La Roche & Co. Aktien-Gesellschaft v Commissioner of Patents (1971) 123 CLR 529 Rehm Pty Ltd v Websters Security Systems (International) Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 79 CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Ltd (1994) 51 FCR 260 Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (2004) 212 ALR 1 Atlantis Corporation Pty Ltd v Schindler (1997) 39 IPR 29 Catnic Components Limited v Hill & Smith Limited [1982] RPC 183 Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control Technologies Pty Ltd (2000) 177 ALR 231 Improver Corporation v Remington Consumer Products Limited [1990] FSR 181 Nobel's Explosives Company Limited v Anderson (1894) 11 RPC 519 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1988) 13 IPR 385 Populin v HB Nominees Pty Ltd (1982) 41 ALR 471 Flexible Steel Lacing Company v Beltreco Ltd (2000) 49 IPR 331 Gambro Pty Ltd v Fresenius Medical Care South East Asia Pty Ltd (2004) 61 IPR 442 Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie SA v UIM Chemical Services Pty Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 477 Wheatley (Davina) v Drillsafe Ltd [2001] RPC 7 Patent Gesellschaft AG v Saudi Livestock Transport and Trading Company (1996) 33 IPR 426 Allsop Inc v Bintang Ltd (1989) 15 IPR 686 Sartas No 1 Pty Ltd v Koukourou & Partners Pty Ltd (1994) 30 IPR 479 Azuko Pty Ltd v Old Digger Pty Ltd (2001) 52 IPR 75 Commonwealth Industrial Gases Ltd v M.W.A. Holdings Pty Ltd (1970) 180 CLR 160 Doric Products Pty Ltd v Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd (2001) 192 ALR 306 Nesbit Evans Group Australia Pty Ltd v Impro Ltd (1997) 39 IPR 56 Neurizon Pty Ltd v Jupiters Ltd (2004) 62 IPR 569 Sydney Cellulose Pty Ltd v Ceil Comfort Home Insulation Pty Ltd (2001) 53 IPR 359 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v Tyco Electronics Pty (2001) 53 IPR 32 Bartlem Pty Ltd v CMMC Pty Ltd (2001) 53 IPR 124 Great Western Corporation Pty Ltd v Grove Hill Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 423 Wimmera Industrial Minerals Pty Ltd v RGC Mineral Sands Ltd (No 3) (1997) AIPC 91-366 Hutt v Enig Pty Ltd (1998) 41 IPR 559 Cenefill Pty Ltd v Australian Sheetpiling Pty Ltd (1996) 35 IPR 64 Winner v Morey Haigh & Associates (A'Asia) Pty Ltd (1996) 33 IPR 215 Astra Lakemedel Aktiebolag v Commissioner of Patents (1995) 56 FCR 208 Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] 1 All ER 667 Union Carbide Corp v BP Chemicals Ltd [1999] RPC 409 Sundstrand Corporation v Safe Flight Instrument Corporation [1994] FSR 599 Insituform Technical Services Ltd v Inliner U.K. PLC [1992] RPC 83
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate