Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAXG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 400 MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Magistrates Court – application for a protection visa – proposed amended notice of appeal – whether ground contained therein has reasonable prospects of success – whether material before the Tribunal raised a particular social group for consideration Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36 Applicant S v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2004] HCA 25 considered Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 109 FCR 397 cited NAGV and NAGW of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 6 cited NAXG, NAXH and NAXI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 1908 of 2004 BRANSON J 13 APRIL 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1908 of 2004
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NAXG
FIRST APPELLANT
NAXH
SECOND APPELLANT
NAXI
THIRD APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 APRIL 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed 2. The first and second appellants pay the respondent's costs.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1908 of 2004
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NAXG
FIRST APPELLANT
NAXH
SECOND APPELLANT
NAXI
THIRD APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE: 13 APRIL 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate