Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd [2005] FCA 406 International Companies Act No 32 of 1992 (Republic of Vanuatu) s 125, s 129 Interpretation Act No 9 of 1981 (Republic of Vanuatu) UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD & ORS v SHARMAN LICENSE HOLDINGS LTD & ORS NSD 110 OF 2004 HELY J 8 APRIL 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 110 OF 2004
BETWEEN: UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 000 158 592)
FIRST APPLICANT
FESTIVAL RECORDS PTY LTD
(ACN 000 111 197) AND MUSHROOM RECORDS PTY LTD (ACN 005 594 043) TRADING AS FESTIVAL MUSHROOM RECORDS
SECOND APPLICANT
EMI MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 000 070 235)
THIRD APPLICANT
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (ACN 000 033 581)
FOURTH APPLICANT
WARNER MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 000 815 565)
FIFTH APPLICANT
BMG AUSTRALIA LIMITED
(ACN 004 157 564)
SIXTH APPLICANT
AND: SHARMAN LICENSE HOLDINGS LTD
FIRST RESPONDENT
SHARMAN NETWORKS LTD
SECOND RESPONDENT
LEF INTERACTIVE PTY LTD
(ACN 099 675 242)
THIRD RESPONDENT
NICOLA ANNE HEMMING
FOURTH RESPONDENT
PHIL MORLE
FIFTH RESPONDENT
ALTNET INC
SIXTH RESPONDENT
BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT INC
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT PTY LTD
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
KEVIN GLEN BERMEISTER
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate