Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lee v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCA 464
MIGRATION – application for review of decision of the Migration Review Tribunal – application for subclass 820 (spouse) visa – criteria for determining spousal relationship under reg 1.15A of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – living together for six months or more to be taken as strong evidence of genuine and continuing relationship – creation of statutory presumption – insufficient evidence of social recognition of relationship – insufficient evidence of joint financial obligations – alleged jurisdictional error by Tribunal – failure to take evidence of living together for six months or more as strong evidence of marital relationship – denial of procedural fairness – legitimate expectation that Tribunal would give weight to statements not in the form of statutory declarations – Applicant not informed that statements would be given no weight nor given opportunity to present statements in form acceptable to Tribunal – Tribunal free to determine strength of and weight given to other evidence – no jurisdictional error or error of law – no failure of procedural fairness – application dismissed.
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.15A(1A), reg 1.15A(3), reg 1.15A(5)
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Asif 60 ALD 145 cited
Davis v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 686 cited
Lumanovska v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1321 cited
WACO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 131 FCR 511 cited
WAJR v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 204 ALR 624 cited
YOUNG NAM LEE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate