Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant M1 of 2004 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 469
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for leave to appeal interlocutory judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court — Federal Magistrates Court dismissed an application to reinstate a proceeding — leave to appeal refused MIGRATION — failure to appear in Federal Magistrates Court — no adequate explanation offered — no evidence that appearing would have changed outcome — no arguable case for review
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A)
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 as amended by the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees 1967 art 1A(2)
Evangelista v CPS Credit Union (SA) Ltd [2005] FCA 345 cited Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 applied
APPLICANT M1 of 2004 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
V199 of 2005
MERKEL J
22 APRIL 2005
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V199 of 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANT M1 of 2004
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MERKEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 APRIL 2005
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Leave to appeal from the interlocutory judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court refusing the application for reinstatement of the proceeding is refused. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to this application for leave. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V199 of 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate