Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Miller v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [2005] FCA 482 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – decision by Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions to take over proceeding instituted by private individual - scope of power – whether Director can take over proceeding for sole purpose of causing it to be discontinued
Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth) s 9(5) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Administrative Decisions Judicial Review Act 1977 (Cth) s 5(1)(c), (d) and (e) Federal Court Rules O 20 r 2 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 at 84-5 referred to General Steel Industries Inc. v Commissioner for Railways (N.S.W.) (1964) 112 CLR 125 at 128-9 referred to Walton v Gardiner (1983) 177 CLR 379 at 393 and 411 referred to Barton v R (1980) 147 CLR 75 at 94-6 and 110-111 referred to Jarett v Seymour (1993) 119 ALR 46 at 54 referred to Barton v R (1980) 147 CLR 75 at 92-3 and 110 referred to Maxwell v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 501 at 534 referred to Stefanovski v The Magistrates' Court of Victoria [2004] VSC 313 at [12] referred to Hanna v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2005] NSWSC 134 referred to LANCE STEWART MILLER v COMMONWEALTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS V1308 of 2004 WEINBERG J 22 APRIL 2005 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V1308 OF 2004
BETWEEN: LANCE STEWART MILLER
APPLICANT
AND: COMMONWEALTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WEINBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 APRIL 2005
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The relief sought by the respondent's notice of motion filed on 24 February 2005 be granted. 2. The application be dismissed, with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate