Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Schiffer v Pattison [2005] FCA 494 BANKRUPTCY – bankrupt discharged from bankruptcy – trustee issued proceedings in Federal Magistrates Court to recover money from bankrupt – trustee's calculation based upon assessments of amount of income bankrupt likely to have derived during certain specified contribution assessment periods – reasonable remuneration used as basis for calculations – no payment made – trustee issued certificate of outstanding contribution, filed in Federal Magistrates Court – trustee sought summary judgment against respondent – respondent challenged validity of certificate of outstanding contribution – respondent also filed purported cross-claim seeking declaratory relief – Federal Magistrate held no arguable defence raised, summarily dismissed cross-claim, and made findings as to respondent's lack of cooperation with trustee – appeal to Federal Court – whether leave to appeal required from summary judgment – whether leave to appeal should be granted – whether appellant needed to pursue cross-claim for declaratory relief – whether Federal Magistrate should have dealt with appellant's challenges to validity of key documents – whether Federal Magistrate erred by having regard to irrelevant considerations
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 139S, 139W(1), 139Y, 139ZG(4) and (5)
Re Ellis; Ex parte Jefferson & Stevenson (unreported, Federal Court of Australia, 17 February 1995) discussed Kluska v Kluska [1965] VR 457 referred to Tampion v Anderson (1974) 3 ALR 414 considered Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1980) 147 CLR 35 considered MZWHW v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 466 at [6] referred to Cox Brothers (Australia) Ltd v Cox (1934) 50 CLR 314 followed Standard Discount Co v La Grange (1877) 3 CPD 67 referred to In re a Debtor (1903) 19 TLR 152 referred to Salter Rex & Co v Ghosh [1971] 2 QB 597 at 601 referred to Weatherall v Satellite Receiving Systems (Aust) Pty Ltd (1999) 30 ACSR 698 referred to National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Ltd v Grosvenor Hill (Qld) (2001) 183 ALR 700 referred to Cubillo v Commonwealth (2001) 112 FCR 455 at 503 referred to Johnston v Cameron (2002) 124 FCR 160 at [8] followed Decor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 followed Geoffrey Inc v Luik (1997) 38 IPR 555 referred to Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 followed General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 followed McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd (1999) 165 ALR 409 at [12]–[19] referred to Energex Ltd v Alstom Australia Ltd [2004] FCA 575 at [157]-[161] referred to HORST DIETER SCHIFFER v PAUL ANTHONY PATTISON V436 OF 2004 WEINBERG J 26 APRIL 2005 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate