Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Perre v Apand Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 542
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to issue a subpoena – whether relevant documents were in the possession, custody or control of the second or third respondents – whether application constituted a 'fishing expedition'.
Fruit and Plant Protection Act 1968 (SA) Crown Proceedings Act 1992 (SA)
Sparnon & Ors v Apand Pty Ltd & Ors (unreported, von Doussa J, 20 December 1996) referred to The Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR(NSW) 564 applied Hennessy v Wright (No 2) (1890) 23 QBD 445 cited
FRANK PERRE & ORS v APAND PTY LTD & ORS SAD 28 of 1994 LANDER J 6 MAY 2005 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 28 OF 1994
BETWEEN: FRANK PERRE, CATERINA PERRE, PASQUALE PERRE, MARY PERRE, GUISEPPE DOMENICO PERRE, MARIA PERRE, JIM PERRE, FRANCES PERRE, WARRUGA FARMS PTY LTD, PERRE'S VINEYARDS PTY LTD, PASQUALE PERRE AND GRACE PERRE
FIRST TO ELEVENTH APPLICANTS
RANGARA PTY LTD, FRANCESCO PERRE AND MARIA PERRE
TWELFTH TO FOURTEENTH APPLICANTS
AND: APAND PTY LTD
FIRST RESPONDENT
THE MINISTER OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES
SECOND RESPONDENT
THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 6 MAY 2005
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Leave to issue a subpoena directed to Dr Scholefield refused. 2. The applicant to pay the second and third respondents' costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 28 OF 1994
BETWEEN: FRANK PERRE, CATERINA PERRE, PASQUALE PERRE, MARY PERRE, GUISEPPE DOMENICO PERRE, MARIA PERRE, JIM PERRE, FRANCES PERRE, WARRUGA FARMS PTY LTD, PERRE'S VINEYARDS PTY LTD, PASQUALE PERRE AND GRACE PERRE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate