Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Su v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 655
MIGRATION - Appeal from Federal Magistrates Court decision dismissing application for judicial review of Migration Review Tribunal (MRT) decision - refusal of Temporary Business (Class UC) Subclass 457 visa where appellant not in possession of substantive visa when visa application lodged - whether appellant not in possession of substantive visa for 'factors beyond his control' - whether MRT committed jurisdictional error by mechanically applying Migration Series Instruction 374 - appeal allowed Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 5, 359A Migration Regulations 1994 Schedule 3, criterion 3004 Migration Series Instructions 374 Susaki v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 196 cited PIN LIANG SU & ANOR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NSD 357 OF 2005 HELY J 24 MAY 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 357 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: PIN LIANG SU
XIN QUIONG SU
APPELLANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HELY J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 MAY 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be upheld. 2. The orders made by Lloyd-Jones FM on 24 February 2005 be set aside. 3. The decision made by the MRT on 21 July 2004 be set aside. 4. The matter be remitted to the MRT for determination according to law. 5. The Minister pay the appellant's costs of the proceedings in the Federal Magistrates Court, and of the appeal to this Court. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate