Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZEOE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 694 MIGRATION – appeal from judgment of Federal Magistrate – protection visa application – membership of a particular social group – claim based on appellant's homosexuality – whether fear of persecution well-founded – whether Refugee Review Tribunal divided social group into those who live discreetly and those who do not – whether Refugee Review Tribunal focused on appellant's individual claim as opposed to the fate of the particular social group – discretion to dismiss application for judicial review on account of delay – seven year delay in seeking judicial review of decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal – high threshold for appellate interference in Federal Magistrate's exercise of discretion. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 25(1A) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 425(1)
Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 discussed Applicant NABD of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 29 referred to House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Singh (1997) 72 FCR 288 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Khawar (2002) 210 CLR 1 referred to NAUV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 124 referred to Plaintiff S157 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 cited SZEOE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NSD 46 OF 2005 STONE J 31 MAY 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 46 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZEOE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate