Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 764
COSTS – Security for ‑ applicant a natural person – predisposition against ordering provision of security by an impecunious applicant – discretionary factors – question of weakness of applicant's case on pleadings – effect of cross claim raising same facts – changes of applicant's name and address. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56 Federal Court Rules O 28 r 3(1)(c) Hinde v Haskew (1884) 1 TLR 94 cited Pearson v Naydler [1977] 1 WLR 899 at 902 cited Orr v Lusute Pty Ltd (1987) 72 ALR 617 cited Morris v Hanley [2000] NSWSC 957 cited The Airtourer Co-operative Ltd v Millicer Aircraft Industries Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1400 cited Chang v Comcare Australia [1999] FCA 1677 cited James v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No. 1) (1985) 9 FCR 442 cited Weston v Beaufils (1993) 43 FCR 292 cited Famel Pty Ltd v Burswood Management Ltd (1989) 11 ATPR 40-962 cited Cameron's Unit Services Pty Ltd v Kevin R Whelpton and Associates (Australia) Pty Ltd (1986) 13 FCR 46 cited Gartner v Ernst & Young (No. 3) [2003] FCA 1437 cited Barton v Minister for Foreign Affairs (1984) 2 FCR 463 cited Cunningham v Olliver (unreported, Burchett J, 21 November 1994) cited Loque v Hansen Technologies Ltd [2003] FCA 81 cited Morris v Hanley & Ors [2001] NSWCA 374 cited Melville v Craig Nowlan & Associates Pty Ltd (2002) 54 NSWLR 82 cited ANDREW KNIGHT v BEYOND PROPERTIES PTY LTD & ORS NSD 131 of 2005 LINDGREN J 10 JUNE 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD131 OF 2005
BETWEEN: ANDREW KNIGHT
APPLICANT
AND: BEYOND PROPERTIES PTY LTD
FIRST RESPONDENT
BEYOND INTERNATIONAL LTD
SECOND RESPONDENT
DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS INC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate