Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Glencore International AG v Selwyn Mines Limited [2005] FCA 801
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – preliminary discovery – not available where sole purpose to enable decision to be made whether judgment likely to be enforceable against respondent – not available against third party but only against the party from whom applicant may have a right to obtain relief – meaning of 'reasonable cause to believe that the applicant has or may have the right to obtain relief'.
Federal Court Rules O 15A r 6
Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 1 cited Alphapharm Pty Ltd v Eli Lilly Australia Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 391 cited Gulf Petroleum (WA) Ltd v Tah Land Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1531 cited Minister for Health and Aged Care v Harrington Associates Ltd [1999] FCA 549 cited C7 Pty Ltd v Foxtel Management Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1864 cited
GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG v
SELWYN MINES LIMITED & ORS NSD 1811 OF 2004 LINDGREN J 17 JUNE 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1811 OF 2004
BETWEEN: GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG
APPLICANT
AND: SELWYN MINES LIMITED
(RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED)
FIRST RESPONDENT
SELWYN OPERATIONS PTY LIMITED
(RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED)
(IN LIQUIDATION)
SECOND RESPONDENT
SELWYN QUEENSLAND PTY LIMITED
(RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED)
(IN LIQUIDATION)
THIRD RESPONDENT
BANK OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LIMITED
FOURTH RESPONDENT
WILLIAM JAMES HOWE
FIFTH RESPONDENT
GRAEME HOGAN
SIXTH RESPONDENT
JON BERNARD NORTH
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate