Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Calder v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCA 911
INCOME TAX - tax avoidance - amended assessments - allowable deductions - whether scheme to which Part IVA of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) applies - investment in tea-tree project - whether it would be concluded that taxpayer entered into scheme with dominant purpose of obtaining tax benefits - dominant purpose considered having regard to the factors in s 177D(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) INCOME TAX - deductions – management and farm fees and interest – prepaid management and farm fees and prepaid interest – whether allowable deductions Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZ(a) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Pt IVA, ss 51(1), 170, 170(2)(b)(ii), 177A(1), 177C, 177C(1), 177D, 177D(a), 177D(b)(i)-(viii) Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v Spotless Services Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 404 Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Press Holdings Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 235 Commissioner of Taxation v Cooke [2004] FCAFC 75 Commissioner of Taxation v Sleight [2004] FCAFC 94 Eastern Nitrogen Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 108 FCR 27 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Hart (2004) 206 ALR 207 Fletcher v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1991) 173 CLR 1 Peabody v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 40 FCR 531 Puzey v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 194 ALR 615 Vincent v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 124 FCR 350 MICHAEL CALDER v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION WAD 13 of 2003 WAD 14 of 2003 NICHOLSON J 1 JULY 2005 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 13 OF 2003
WAD 14 OF 2003
BETWEEN: MICHAEL CALDER
APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: NICHOLSON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate