Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bates v Dow Corning (Australia) Pty Limited [2005] FCA 927 REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – proceedings on foot in United States of America – group members settling in United States of America – whether necessary for Court to approve settlement pursuant to s 33V(1) of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – proceedings discontinued Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – Part IVA Courtney v Medtel (2002) 122 FCR 168 referred to BIANCA BATES v DOW CORNING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED & ORS NG 641 of 1994 JACOBSON J 30 JUNE 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 641 of 1994
BETWEEN: BIANCA BATES
APPLICANT
AND: DOW CORNING (AUSTRALIA)
PTY LIMITED (ACN 008 444 166)
FIRST RESPONDENT
DOW CHEMICAL (AUSTRALIA) LTD Second Respondent DOW CORNING CORPORATION Third Respondent DOW CORNING STI Fourth Respondent DOW CORNING WRIGHT CORPORATION Fifth Respondent DOW CORNING WRIGHT/MEDICAL MATERIALS Sixth Respondent DOW CHEMICAL CO (DELAWARE) Seventh Respondent DOW CHEMICAL CO (MICHIGAN)
Eighth Respondent
JUDGE: JACOBSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 30 JUNE 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. In accordance with s33V(1) of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth), I will give leave and approval for the applicants to discontinue the proceedings.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 641 of 1994
BETWEEN: BIANCA BATES
APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate