Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Haddad v A & W Hollier Wholesale Distributors Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 930
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to set aside subpoena – no question of principle ANTHONY HADDAD v A & W HOLLIER WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS PTY LIMITED & ANOR NSD 1813 OF 2004 HELY J 7 JULY 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1813 OF 2004
BETWEEN: ANTHONY HADDAD
PLAINTIFF
AND: A & W HOLLIER WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 001 479 367)
FIRST DEFENDANT
ARTHUR JOSEPH ESSEY
SECOND DEFENDANT
A & W HOLLIER WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 001 479 367)
FIRST CROSS CLAIMANT
ARTHUR JOSEPH ESSEY
SECOND CROSS CLAIMANT
ANTHONY HADDAD
FIRST CROSS DEFENDANT
MARIE HADDAD (AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF THE LATE JOSEPH HADDAD)
SECOND CROSS DEFENDANT
JUDGE: HELY J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 JULY 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The notice of motion filed on behalf of Simon Chhoeu on 14 June 2005 be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1813 OF 2004
BETWEEN: ANTHONY HADDAD
PLAINTIFF
AND: A & W HOLLIER WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 001 479 367)
FIRST DEFENDANT
ARTHUR JOSEPH ESSEY
SECOND DEFENDANT
A & W HOLLIER WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 001 479 367)
FIRST CROSS CLAIMANT
ARTHUR JOSEPH ESSEY
SECOND CROSS CLAIMANT
ANTHONY HADDAD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate