Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Walter Rau Neusser Oel Und Fett AG v Cross Pacific Trading Ltd [2005] FCA 955 WALTER RAU NEUSSER OEL UND FETT AG v Cross Pacific Trading LTD AND ORS NSD 432 of 2005 ALLSOP J 18 JULY 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 432 of 2005
BETWEEN: WALTER RAU NEUSSER OEL UND FETT AG
APPLICANT
AND: CROSS PACIFIC TRADING LTD
FIRST RESPONDENT
PATRICK SHUNG WONG
SECOND RESPONDENT
WILLEM JOHAN VAN VLYMEN
THIRD RESPONDENT
ORBIS COMMODITIES PTY LIMITED
FOURTH RESPONDENT
INTERNATIONAL COMTRADE & SHIPPING LIMITED
FIFTH RESPONDENT
RUSSELL ISLAND PLANTATION ESTATES LIMITED
SIXTH RESPONDENT
KAY LITTLEJOHN
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: ALLSOP J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 JULY 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Orders 3 to 24 made on 21 March 2005, to the extent that they have been extended and are operative, be discharged.
2. Within fourteen days, the parties file brief submissions (no more than three pages) on the form of order as to costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 432 of 2005
BETWEEN: WALTER RAU NEUSSER OEL UND FETT AG
APPLICANT
AND: CROSS PACIFIC TRADING LTD
FIRST RESPONDENT
PATRICK SHUNG WONG
SECOND RESPONDENT
WILLEM JOHAN VAN VLYMEN
THIRD RESPONDENT
ORBIS COMMODITIES PTY LIMITED
FOURTH RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate