Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NADZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 975 MIGRATION – third application for review of Refugee Review Tribunal decision; whether precluded by res judicata, issue estoppel and/or Anshun estoppel; appeal from summary dismissal by Federal Magistrates Court of third application as an abuse of process. Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia s 75(v) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1)(d), 24(1A) Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth) Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 R 13.10(c) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36, 45-7, 65-6, 411-2, 425-6, 430-1 Federal Magistrates Service Legislation Amendment Act 2001 (Cth) Shergold v Tanner (2002) 209 CLR 126 referred to Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Limited (1995) 183 CLR 168 referred to Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Proprietary Limited (No 1) (1980) 147 CLR 35 referred to MZWHW v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 466 referred to Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 referred to Wong v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 204 ALR 722 referred to Wong v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 242 cited Thayananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 132 FCR 222 referred to Somanader v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 178 ALR 677 referred to Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 referred to Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare; 67 ER 319 cited BC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 221 referred to SZDCJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 212 ALR 581 referred to NADZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS & ANOR NSD 834/2005 GRAHAM J 15 JULY 2005 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate