Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
James v Hill [2005] FCA 981
BANKRUPTCY – appeal – application to set aside bankruptcy notice – judgment debt – counter-claim, set-off or cross-demand – assignment of action in injurious falsehood – whether appellant as assignee demonstrated a prima facie case to recover damages equal to or in excess of the judgment debt APPEAL – evidence – application for evidence to be received on appeal – whether open to appellant to establish a counter-claim, set-off or cross-demand that did not exist when application to set aside bankruptcy notice was first heard
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) par 40(1)(g), subs 41(7) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) par 24(1)(d), subs 25(1A)
Federal Court Rules O 52 r 36 Federal Magistrates Court Rules r 30.02
Crimmins v Glenview Home Units [1999] FCA 515 referred to K Mart Australia Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [1995] FCA 760 cited Patane v Asteron Life Ltd [2004] FCA 232 followed Poulton v The Commonwealth (1953) 89 CLR 540 referred to DAVID ANTHONY JAMES v TERRY DONALD HILL NSD 949 of 2005 BRANSON J 19 JULY 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 949 of 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: DAVID ANTHONY JAMES
APPELLANT/CROSS RESPONDENT
AND: TERRY DONALD HILL
RESPONDENT/CROSS APPELLANT
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 JULY 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The cross appeal be dismissed. 3. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. 4. The respondent pay the appellant's costs of the cross appeal, if any, such costs, if any, to be set off against the costs payable pursuant to order 3 hereof. 5. If a sequestration order against the estate of the appellant is made consequent upon the appellant's failure to comply with the requirements of the bankruptcy notice numbered NA 3422/04, the costs to which the respondent is entitled be taxed and paid in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate