Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Keshow (No.2) [2005] FCA 989
TRADE PRACTICES – representative action by ACCC – motion seeking compensation orders pursuant to s 87(1A) of the Act – motion reliant upon findings of fact as between applicant and respondent given in earlier judgment – whether necessary to rely upon s 83 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 83 Trade Practices Amendment Act (No.1) 2001 (Cth)
Fenech v Sterling (1983) 79 FLR 244 distinguished Jones v Sterling (1982) 63 FLR 216 distinguished Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1980) 28 ALR 497 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Black on White [2002] FCA 739 cited Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 388 cited Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 196 CLR 494 cited Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 applied Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 cited AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v RAMON KESHOW NTD 19 of 2004 MANSFIELD J 21 JULY 2005 DARWIN
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY NTD 19 OF 2004
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
APPLICANT
AND: RAMON KESHOW
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 JULY 2005
WHERE MADE: DARWIN
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Respondent pay compensation pursuant to section 87(1A) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) to each of the following persons named in the following amounts: Ingrid White $10,440 Roseanne Dixon $2,080 Deanne Williams $6,930 Louanne Patterson $680 Marlene Doolan $720 Rosina Dickson $4,000 Fiona Turner $1,080 Muriel Palmer $600 in the manner referred to in order 3 hereof. 2. The Respondent pay to the Applicant costs of and incidental to its Notice of Motion of 23 June 2005. 3. The Respondent pay the amounts referred to in order 1 hereof to the 'Australian Government Solicitor Trust Account' at Australian Government Solicitor, Level 20, 25 Grenfell Street, Adelaide SA 5000 within 30 days of the date of these orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate