Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZAPC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 995 MIGRATION – appeal – protection visa – Ahmadiyya religion in Bangladesh – claim to practise discreetly – whether consideration given to reason for discreet practice – finding that independent information indicated situation had improved – whether no evidence – whether jurisdictional fact. Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 followed Applicant S70 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 182 cited Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 distinguished H v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2000) 63 ALD 43 cited Iyer v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1788 followed Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 followed Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 followed NADH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 328 followed NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No. 2) [2004] FCAFC 263 cited NAEB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 79 distinguished NAHI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 cited NAVZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 13 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v SGLB (2004) 207 ALR 12 followed Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59 followed VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158 followed WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 75 ALD 630 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v W306/1A [2003] FCAFC 208 cited SZAPC v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL N 670 OF 2004 MADGWICK J SYDNEY 27 JULY 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate