Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Elsinora Global Ltd & Ors v Healthscope Ltd & Ors (No 1) [2005] FCA 1017
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – discovery – no point of principle
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 255 ELSINORA GLOBAL LTD & ORS v HEALTHSCOPE LTD & ORS NSD 96 of 2005 EDMONDS J 26 JULY 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 96 OF 2005
BETWEEN: ELSINORA GLOBAL LIMITED
FIRST APPLICANT
TIOGA WORLDWIDE LIMITED
SECOND APPLICANT
PERLETTE OVERSEAS LIMITED
THIRD APPLICANT
PETER ARMSTRONG
FOURTH APPLICANT
JONATHAN BERGER
FIFTH APPLICANT
EC MEDICAL INVESTMENTS NV
SIXTH APPLICANT
AND: HEALTHSCOPE LIMITED
(ACN 006 405 152)
FIRST RESPONDENT
ANZ NOMINEES LIMITED
(ACN 005 357 568)
SECOND RESPONDENT
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EDMONDS J
DATE OF ORDER: 26 JULY 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicants shall give discovery of the classes of documents referred to in the paragraphs of the Notice for Discovery dated 15 July 2005 as amended by the alterations set out in paragraph [9] of the Reasons for Judgement. 2. The applicants file and serve any Reply and any Defence to the Amended Cross-Claim by 10 August 2005. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 96 OF 2005
BETWEEN: ELSINORA GLOBAL LIMITED & OTHERS
APPLICANTS
AND: HEALTHSCOPE LIMITED
(ACN 006 405 152)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate