Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VWZG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1018 MIGRATION – application to review decision of Refugee Review Tribunal brought out of time – res judicata – Anshun estoppel – abuse of process – costs
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 477(1)
Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 1254 referred to NABF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 179 cited NADP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 185 cited NADP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 178 cited Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 cited Somanader v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1192 referred to SZATJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 168 referred to SZEUK v Minister for Immigration [2004] FMCA 829 cited Walton v Gardner (1993) 177 CLR 378 cited
VWZG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
VID413 of 2005
WEINBERG J
21 JULY 2005
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID413 OF 2005
BETWEEN: VWZG
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WEINBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 JULY 2005
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed as incompetent. 2. Further, or in the alternative, the application be dismissed as an abuse of the process of the Court. 3. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID413 OF 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate