Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZDLA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1048
MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Magistrates Court – parties agreed that Federal Magistrate's judgment interlocutory in nature – leave to appeal required – application for leave to appeal brought out of time – further amended notice of appeal treated as application for enlargement of time to apply for leave to appeal and application for leave to appeal – appellants are a wife, a husband and a daughter – appellant wife was only applicant for protection visa with specific claims for refugee status – husband and child appellants applied as member of appellant wife's family unit – appellant wife undertook to pass on all correspondence from Tribunal to husband and child appellants – invitation to Tribunal hearing addressed to appellant wife but referred to appellant husband and child as well – appellant bound to pass on invitation to appellant husband and child – whether failure of Tribunal to invite appellant husband and child individually in breach of ss 425 and 425A of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Tribunal's finding that appellant wife's treatment was not by reason of her religion was based on an unwarranted assumption – appeal dismissed
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 425 and 425A Migration Legislation Amendment Act (No 1) 1998 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 1976 (Cth) SZDLA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCMA 722 affirmed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SCAR (2003) 128 FCR 553 referred to Mazhar v Minister for Immigration (2000) 183 ALR 188 cited Xiao v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1472 referred to Applicant NAHF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 128 FCR 359 referred to SZDGN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1543 cited WACB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 210 ALR 190 discussed Applicant NAFF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 211 ALR 660 discussed Lu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 340 referred to WAGO of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) 194 ALR 676 distinguished Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 cited De Silva v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 98 FCR 364 referred to Liu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 113 FCR 541 cited Tin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1109 cited SZDLA AND SZDLB AND SZDLC v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NSD 1558 OF 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate