Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MZKAJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1066 MZKAJ, MZKAK AND MZKAI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS VID 1447 OF 2004 NORTH J 4 AUGUST 2005 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1447 OF 2004
BETWEEN: MZKAJ
FIRST APPELLANT
MZKAK
SECOND APPELLANT
MZKAI
THIRD APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: NORTH J
DATE OF ORDER: 4 AUGUST 2005
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application to reinstate the appeal is dismissed. 2. The application to rely upon new grounds of appeal is dismissed. 3. The appeal is dismissed. 4. The question of costs is reserved. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1447 OF 2004
BETWEEN: MZKAJ
FIRST APPELLANT
MZKAK
SECOND APPELLANT
MZKAI
THIRD APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: NORTH J
DATE: ## JULY 2005
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 Before the Court is an appeal from a decision of Phipps FM delivered on 9November 2004. The Federal Magistrate dismissed applications for review of two decisions of the Refugee Review Tribunal (the Tribunal), both made on 18 September 2002. The Tribunal affirmed decisions of the delegate of the respondent, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, not to grant protection visas to the appellants. On 19 May 2005 the Chief Justice determined that this appeal be heard by a single judge pursuant to s 25(1A) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate