Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAUW v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1086 MIGRATION – protection visa application – appellant claimed to be Falun Gong practitioner – Refugee Review Tribunal relied on a list of businessmen forming a business delegation to Australia of which appellant was one – where list pre-dated appellant's claimed Convention related catalyst for coming to Australia – where list not provided to appellant – whether failure to provide list involved contravention of s 424A of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Refugee Review Tribunal provided alternate reasoning accepting the appellant was a Falun Gong practitioner – where Tribunal found appellant would be able to practise Falun Gong in secret or in the privacy of own home – where Tribunal failed to ask itself the correct questions Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 424A NAUW v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NSD 262 OF 2005 MOORE J 12 AUGUST 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 262 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NAUW
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 AUGUST 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The Refugee Review Tribunal be added as a respondent. 2. The appeal be allowed. 3. The orders of the Federal Magistrate in proceedings SYG2575 of 2003 be set aside and, in lieu thereof, it be ordered that: a. The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal of 27 June 2003 be quashed. b. The matter be remitted to the Refugee Review Tribunal to be determined according to law. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate