Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
von Arnim v Federal Republic of Germany (No 3) [2005] FCA 1128
DR ULRICH CHRISTOPH EBERHARD FREIHERR VON ARNIM v FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (Represented by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions), THE COMMONWEALTH MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND CUSTOMS, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and GROUP 4 CORRECTION SERVICES PTY LTD V 316 of 2001 FINKELSTEIN J 16 AUGUST 2005 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 316 of 2001
BETWEEN: DR ULRICH CHRISTOPH EBERHARD FREIHERR VON ARNIM
Applicant
AND: FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (Represented by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions),
THE COMMONWEALTH MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND CUSTOMS,
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and
GROUP 4 CORRECTION SERVICES PTY LTD
Respondents
JUDGE: FINKELSTEIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 AUGUST 2005
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the second and third respondents' costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 316 of 2001
BETWEEN: DR ULRICH CHRISTOPH EBERHARD FREIHERR VON ARNIM
Applicant
AND: FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (Represented by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions),
THE COMMONWEALTH MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND CUSTOMS,
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and
GROUP 4 CORRECTION SERVICES PTY LTD
Respondents
JUDGE: FINKELSTEIN J
DATE: 16 AUGUST 2005
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 I delivered reasons for judgment in this application on 3 June 2005. In view of the complexity of the case I made no final orders disposing of the application, but requested the applicant to inform me if there was a particular claim not specifically dealt with but which would not be decided against him in light of the findings I had made. In response, the applicant identified aspects of his submissions which had not been specifically discussed in my reasons, as well as cases upon which he had relied but to which I had made no reference. None of the submissions and none of the cases are of any continuing relevance having regard to the findings I have in fact made. There being no other issues that I need to decide, the appropriate order to make is to dismiss the application with costs. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Finkelstein.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate