Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZFXH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1140
MIGRATION – Refugee Review Tribunal – application for leave to appeal – Federal Magistrate dismissed application for review as incompetent – whether interlocutory or final judgment – where applicant has already sought review of same Tribunal decision on three other occasions – application dismissed
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 (Cth).
Bienstein v Bienstein (2003) 195 ALR 225 cited Thomas Borthwick & Sons (Pacific Holdings) Limited v Trade Practices Commission (1988) 18 FCR 424 cited Re Luck (2003) 203 ALR 1 cited Hall v Nominal Defendant (1966) 117 CLR 423 cited SZECK v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 283 discussed SZAQL v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 759 discussed SZFXH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NSD 963 OF 2005 CONTI J 29 JULY 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 963 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZFXH
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: CONTI J
DATE OF ORDER: 29 JULY 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for leave to appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs assessed at $500.00. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 963 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZFXH
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: CONTI J
DATE: 29 JULY 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate