Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Microsoft Corporation v Crosslink Marketing Group (CMG) Pty Limited [2005] FCA 1220 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT PTY LIMITED AND MICROSOFT LICENSING GP v CROSSLINK MARKETING GROUP (CMG) PTY LIMITED, KELL WALKER, ROSALIND SUMNER aka PEE LOO TAN, WAYNE SUMNER NSD 1325 OF 2004 DOWSETT J 19 AUGUST 2005 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1325 OF 2004
BETWEEN: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
FIRST APPLICANT
MICROSOFT PTY LIMITED
SECOND APPLICANT
MICROSOFT LICENSING GP
THIRD APPLICANT
AND: CROSSLINK MARKETING GROUP (CMG) PTY LIMITED
FIRST RESPONDENT
KELL WALKER
SECOND RESPONDENT
ROSALIND SUMNER aka PEE LOO TAN
THIRD RESPONDENT
WAYNE SUMNER
FOURTH RESPONDENT
AND KELL WALKER
FIRST CROSS-CLAIMANT
CROSSLINK MARKETING GROUP (CMG) PTY LIMITED
SECOND CROSS-CLAIMANT
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
CROSS RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 19 AUGUST 2005
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The notice of motion filed on 26 July 2005 by the first and second respondents be dismissed.
2. The first and second respondents pay the costs of and incidental to the motion on an indemnity basis, being the costs incurred by the first, second, and third applicants. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1325 OF 2004
BETWEEN: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
FIRST APPLICANT
MICROSOFT PTY LIMITED
SECOND APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate