Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v SHOWMEN'S GUILD OF AUSTRALASIA [2005] FCA 1234
CONTEMPT – misuse of document produced for inspection following discovery
Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan (1965) 112 CLR 483 AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v SHOWMEN'S GUILD OF AUSTRALASIA & ORS NSD 172 OF 2004 GRAHAM J 31 AUGUST 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 172 OF 2004
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
APPLICANT
AND: THE SHOWMEN'S GUILD OF AUSTRALASIA
FIRST RESPONDENT
LEWIS ERIC OSBORNE
SECOND RESPONDENT
JAMES GAVIN MARSHALL
THIRD RESPONDENT
MARSHALL AMUSEMENTS PTY LTD
FOURTH RESPONDENT
PETER JAMES SHORT
FIFTH RESPONDENT
SPRY AMUSEMENTS PTY LTD
SIXTH RESPONDENT
GEORGE PINK
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
AARON PINK
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
BRODERICK WILLIAM PAVIER
NINTH RESPONDENT
DOREEN GLADYS BROWN
TENTH RESPONDENT
YVONNE CLAIRE SEYMOUR
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: GRAHAM J
DATE OF ORDER: 31 AUGUST 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate