Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Baird v State of Queensland [2005] FCA 1245 JAMES STANLEY BAIRD, MARIE CREEK, FRANK TAYLEY, HENRY WALKER, HENRY DEERAL, EDGAR IVAN GIBSON, ANITA KAREN GORDON AND ELLA WOIBO v STATE OF QUEENSLAND Q 91 OF 2003 DOWSETT J 30 AUGUST 2005 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 91 OF 2003
BETWEEN: JAMES STANLEY BAIRD
FIRST APPLICANT
MARIE CREEK
SECOND APPLICANT
FRANK TAYLEY
THIRD APPLICANT
HENRY WALKER
FOURTH APPLICANT
HENRY DEERAL
FIFTH APPLICANT
EDGAR IVAN GIBSON
SIXTH APPLICANT
ANITA KAREN GORDON
SEVENTH APPLICANT
ELLA WOIBO
EIGHTH APPLICANT
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 30 AUGUST 2005
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicants pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings, including reserved costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 91 OF 2003
BETWEEN: JAMES STANLEY BAIRD
FIRST APPLICANT
MARIE CREEK
SECOND APPLICANT
FRANK TAYLEY
THIRD APPLICANT
HENRY WALKER
FOURTH APPLICANT
HENRY DEERAL
FIFTH APPLICANT
EDGAR IVAN GIBSON
SIXTH APPLICANT
ANITA KAREN GORDON
SEVENTH APPLICANT
ELLA WOIBO
EIGHTH APPLICANT
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE: 30 AUGUST 2005
PLACE: BRISBANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate