Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZEKW v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1272
SZEKW vMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 992 OF 2005
MADGWICK J
7 SEPTEMBER 2005
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 992 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZEKW
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 SEPTEMBER 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as the second respondent. 2. It be noted that the second respondent submits to such orders as the Court finds fit, save as to costs. 3. The appeal be dismissed. 4. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. 5. The entry of the above orders be stayed for 21 days and that the first respondent write to the appellant at Post Office Box 1181, Griffith, New South Wales 2680 and at Farm 535, McDonald Road, Bilbul, Griffith, New South Wales 2680 advising the appellant of all of the orders made today and of the provisions of O 52 r 38A(2)(a). The letter is also to indicate that any application to set aside these orders, or any part of them, should be made by filing and serving on the first respondent notice to that effect on or before 28 September 2005. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 992 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZEKW
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate