Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pine v Multiplex Constructions (Vic) Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1428
INDUSTRIAL LAW – penalty for contravention of s 187AA of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) – payments to employees in relation to a period of industrial action – contravention admitted – penalty to be imposed
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 187AA, 187AD Ponzio v BVM Builders Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 238 - applied Pine v Austress Freyssinet (Vic) Pty Ltd (ACN 089 766 576) [2005] FCA 583 - applied CPSU, The Community and Public Sector Union v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2001) 108 IR 228 - applied Pine v Seelite Windows & Doors Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 500 - cited Ponzio v Firebase Sprinkler Systems Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 773 - cited LISETTE EILEEN PINE v MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS (VIC) PTY LTD AND OTHERS VID 1472 OF 2004 MERKEL J 11 OCTOBER 2005 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1472 OF 2004
BETWEEN: LISETTE EILEEN PINE
APPLICANT
AND: MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS (VIC) PTY LTD
(ACN 007 154 449)
FIRST RESPONDENT
CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
SECOND RESPONDENT
JOHN SETKA
THIRD RESPONDENT
GRANT THORSON
FOURTH RESPONDENT
PETER JOHN COSTELLO
FIFTH RESPONDENT
ALFIO DI VIRGILIO
SIXTH RESPONDENT
MARK EDWARDS
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
JOSE ESTEVES
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
MAX HOOD
NINTH RESPONDENT
HUSEIN KARUPOVIC
TENTH RESPONDENT
JUSTIN NORMAN
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
NICKOLAS CON PAPANOTAS
TWELFTH RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate