Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lisette Pine v Expoconti Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1434 WORKPLACE RELATIONS – payments in relation to periods of industrial action – payment by employer to an employee in relation to a period during which the employee engaged in industrial action while the employee was a member of an organisation – contravention admitted – breach admitted – circumstances in mitigation – institution of procedures to prevent further breaches Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 21 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 4, 84, 187AA, 187AD, 187AF
CPSU v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2001) 108 IR 228, cited CFMEU v Coal & Allied Operations Pty Ltd (No 2) (1999) 94 IR 231, cited Pine v Multiplex Constructions (Vic) Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1428, discussed Pine v Seelite Windows & Doors Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 500, cited Ponzio v Firebase Sprinkler Systems Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 733, followed Ponzio v D and E Air Conditioning Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 964, followed Ponzio v BVM Builders Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 238, discussed Pine v Austress Freyssinet (Vic) Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 583, referred to LISETTE PINE v EXPOCONTI PTY LTD (ACN 007 361 346) V 1508 of 2004 KENNY J 12 OCTOBER 2005 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1508 OF 2005
BETWEEN: LISETTE PINE
APPLICANT
AND: EXPOCONTI PTY LTD
(ACN 007 361 346)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: KENNY J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 OCTOBER 2005
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT DECLARES THAT: 1. Pursuant to s 21 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), the respondent has contravened s 187AA of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) by making a payment or payments to each of: (a) Leigh Bomford; (b) Angelo D'Andrea; (c) Josip Dujmovic; (d) Jason King; (e) Aaron Miller; (f) Adam Morrison; (g) Grant Munyard; (h) Andrew Nelson; (i) Adrian Osbourne; (j) Michael Quick; (k) Noel Sheane-Smith; (l) Gavin Sheane-Smith; (m) George Tsaples; (n) William Turis; and (o) Modesto Vieira for a period or periods on 5 and 6 August in which they engaged in industrial action. 2. Pursuant to s 21 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), the respondent has contravened s 187AA of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) by making a payment or payments to each of: (p) Nathan Hicks; (q) Gary Beecroft; (r) Ivan Vrselja; (s) Toloumu Malota; (t) Momcilo Kosic; (u) Daniel Djokic; (v) Andrew Benn; (w) Brendan Hurd; (x) Joseph Rivera; (y) Vitali Voronov; (z) Jun Guo Liu; (aa) Li Wen Yu; and (bb) Fabio Stradiijot for a period or periods on 5 and 6 August in which they engaged in industrial action. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate