Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MZWZL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1475
MIGRATION – appeal – estoppel – abuse of process – whether final or interlocutory decision of Federal Magistrates Court Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (No 1) (1980) 147 CLR 35 - applied MZWHW v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 446 - applied MZWHN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 491 - distinguished MZWZL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS VID 1055 OF 2005 MZWZS AND MZWZT v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS VID 1056 of 2005 MERKEL J 18 OCTOBER 2005 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
BETWEEN: VID 1055 of 2005
MZWZL
APPELLANT
VID 1056 of 2005
MZWZS AND MZWZT
APPELLANT
AND: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
FIRST RESPONDENT
Refugee Review Tribunal
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MERKEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 OCTOBER 2005
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeals be dismissed. 2. The appellants pay the costs of the respondents of and incidental to the appeals, save for the costs of the first respondent's objection to competency filed on 30 September 2005.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
BETWEEN: VID 1055 of 2005
MZWZL
APPELLANT
VID 1056 of 2005
MZWZS AND MZWZT
APPELLANT
AND: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate