Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
S247/2003 v The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1494
MIGRATION – application for order nisi requiring the respondents to show cause why constitutional writs should not be issued in respect of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal S247/2003 v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS & ORS NSD 1051/2003 GRAHAM J 21 OCTOBER 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1051 OF 2003
BETWEEN: S247/2003
APPLICANT
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: GRAHAM J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 OCTOBER 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for an order nisi be dismissed. 2. The Applicant pay the Respondents' costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1051 OF 2003
BETWEEN: S247/2003
APPLICANT
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate