Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Needlework Warehouse Pty Ltd v Chansonette Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1525
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Federal Court has jurisdiction to enforce contract which settles proceeding before the Court – appropriate to do so on a motion brought within the proceeding. FEDERAL JURISDICTION – Federal Court has jurisdiction to enforce contract which settles proceeding before the Court – appropriate to do so on a motion brought within the proceeding. CONTRACT – contract settling a proceeding pending before Federal Court – contract made by correspondence between parties' solicitors – whether parties contemplated that the agreement would not become enforceable until written agreement signed. CONTRACT – 'without prejudice' – does not make correspondence inadmissible to prove that it constituted a concluded contract.
WORDS AND PHRASES – 'without prejudice' – does not make correspondence inadmissible to prove that it constituted a concluded contract.
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 19, 22 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 86
Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511 followed LNC Industries Ltd v BMW (Australia) Ltd (1983) 151 CLR 575 followed Wenkart v Pantzer (No 3) (2004) 135 FCR 422 referred to Darling Downs Investments Pty Ltd v Ellwood (1988) 18 FCR 510 followed Reid v Interarch Australia Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1328 followed We Two Pty Ltd v Shorrock (No 2) [2005] FCA 934 followed Jarraman Arts Aboriginal Corporation v Tourism Australia (No 3) [2005] FCA 983 followed Pallas v Finlay (1985) 61 ALR 220 distinguished Macteldir Pty Ltd v Dimovski (2003) 132 FCR 492 distinguished Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v SZANS (2005) 141 FCR 586 cited Bank of Western Australia Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 55 FCR 233 cited Cooper v Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 139 FCR 205 cited Roberts v Gippsland Agricultural & Earth Moving Contracting Co Pty Ltd [1956] VLR 555 followed McLaren v Schuit (1983) 33 SASR 139 followed General Credits (Finance) Pty Ltd v Fenton Lake Pty Ltd [1985] 2 Qd R 6 followed Donellan v Watson (1990) 21 NSWLR 335 followed Walker v Wilsher (1889) 23 QBD 335 cited Tellerman & Co Pty Ltd v Nathan's Merchandise (Victoria) Pty Ltd (1957) 98 CLR 93 cited Bentley v Nelson [1963] WAR 89 cited Tomlin v Standard Telephones and Cables Ltd [1969] 1 WLR 1378 cited Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council [1988] 3 WLR 939 cited Quad Consulting Pty Ltd v David R Bleakley & Associates Pty Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 86 cited Cedenco Foods Ltd v State Insurance Ltd [1996] 3 NZLR 205 cited Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 referred to McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd (1933) 48 CLR 457 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate