Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZFJF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1536
MIGRATION – no point of principle SZFJF v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NSD 1909 OF 2005 MOORE J 31 OCTOBER 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD1909 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZFJF
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 31 OCTOBER 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for leave to appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD1909 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZFJF
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE: 31 OCTOBER 2005
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the Federal Magistrate of 16 September 2005. The applicant sought to challenge in the Federal Magistrates Court a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") of 1 November 2004. 2 The applicant is an Indonesian national of Muslim faith. He claimed to have a well founded fear of persecution, at the hands of Christian Catholics, were he to return to Indonesia. The Tribunal did not accept that claim. The applicant was unable to demonstrate jurisdictional error before the Federal Magistrate. In those circumstances the Federal Magistrate dismissed the application summarily. 3 The applicant in this Court has not identified any arguable jurisdictional error on the part of the Tribunal. Indeed, he candidly conceded that what he sought to achieve was an opportunity to remain in Australia for some further period of time. I propose to dismiss the application for leave to appeal with costs. I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate