Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZGIE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1539 SZGIE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs NSD 1717 of 2005 JACOBSON J 25 OCTOBER 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1717 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZGIE
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: JACOBSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 OCTOBER 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for leave to appeal is refused. 2. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs, on an indemnity basis pursuant to Order 62 Rule 4(2)(c) of the Federal Court Rules, fixed in the amount of $1,200.00.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1717 OF 2005
BETWEEN: SZGIE
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: JACOBSON J
DATE: 25 OCTOBER 2005
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1. This is an application for leave to appeal against the orders and judgment of Federal Magistrate Smith dated 1 September 2005. On that date the learned Magistrate dismissed an application for judicial review pursuant to rule 13.10(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules ("FMC Rules"). 2. On 16 September 2005 the applicant filed an application for leave to appeal. The application was accompanied by an affidavit and draft notice of appeal. Leave to appeal is required pursuant to section 24(1A) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) because the orders and judgment of Federal Magistrate Smith are interlocutory.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate