Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Aristocrat Spa Pools Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [2005] FCA 1545
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Federal Court Rules O 35A
ARISTOCRAT SPA POOLS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AND RELIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES PTY LTD v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA AND QBE INSURANCE (AUSTRALIA) LTD
NSD 1124 of 2005
CONTI J 24 OCTOBER 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1124 OF 2005
BETWEEN: ARISTOCRAT SPA POOLS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
FIRST APPLICANT
RELIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES PTY LTD
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
FIRST RESPONDENT
QBE INSURANCE (AUSTRALIA) LTD
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: CONTI J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 OCTOBER 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The proceedings be struck out pursuant to O 35A r 3 of the Federal Court Rules. 2. The first and second applicants pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the proceedings. 3. On the application of the second respondent, that the first and second applicants also pay the costs of the second respondent occasioned by its joinder in the proceedings. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1124 OF 2005
BETWEEN: ARISTOCRAT SPA POOLS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
FIRST APPLICANT
RELIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES PTY LTD
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
FIRST RESPONDENT
QBE INSURANCE (AUSTRALIA) LTD
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: CONTI J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate