Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA S330 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1605 APPLICANT S330 v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ORS NSD 2439 OF 2003 EMMETT J SYDNEY 9 NOVEMBER 2005
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2439 OF 2003
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S330
APPLICANT
AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 NOVEMBER 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Order 51A rule 5(1) not apply to the proceeding. 2. The application for orders nisi be refused.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2439 OF 2003
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S330
APPLICANT
AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE: 9 NOVEMBER 2005
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The applicants are citizens of the Republic of Korea ('South Korea'). In October 1994, the applicants applied for protection visas under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ('the Act'). On 17 February 1997, a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs made a decision refusing that application. On 12 March 1997, the applicants lodged an application for review by the Tribunal of the delegate's decision. On 24 March 1998, the Tribunal affirmed the delegate's decision not to grant the applicants a protection visa.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate