Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Zhang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1706 MIGRATION – visa applications – where person intended visa application to be made and gave documents to intermediary – where completion of form required – where third person filled in and signed form – whether form filled in on person's behalf – whether valid application
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25C Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 46, 47, 48, 98 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.07 Minister for Immigration v Li (2000) 103 FCR 486 applied Sevim v MIMIA (2001) 114 FCR 126, applied Project Blue Sky v ABA (1998) 194 CLR 355, applied RUIE ZHANG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 1456 OF 2005 EDMONDS J 25 NOVEMBER 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1456 OF 2005
BETWEEN: RUIE ZHANG
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EDMONDS J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 NOVEMBER 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Leave to file the amended application be refused. 2. The application be dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1456 OF 2005
BETWEEN: RUIE ZHANG
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EDMONDS J
DATE: 25 NOVEMBER 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate