Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rivera v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [2005] FCA 1741 RIVERA v HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION NSD 1326 OF 2005 GRAHAM J 21 NOVEMBER 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1326 OF 2005
BETWEEN: LAWRENCE RIVERA
APPLICANT
AND: HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
FIRST RESPONDENT
MORGAN ARDINO & CO
SECOND RESPONDENT
RICHARD CUMMINS
THIRD RESPONDENT
THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
FOURTH RESPONDENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
FIFTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: GRAHAM J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 NOVEMBER 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The time within which the Applicant may bring his amended application be extended up to and including 31 October 2005. 2. The amended application be dismissed as against the Second and Third Respondents. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1326 OF 2005
BETWEEN: LAWRENCE RIVERA
APPLICANT
AND: HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
FIRST RESPONDENT
MORGAN ARDINO & CO
SECOND RESPONDENT
RICHARD CUMMINS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate