Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Microsoft Corporation v Crosslink Marketing Group (CMG) Pty Limited and Walker [2005] FCA 1817 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to extend time for making application for leave to appeal – application for leave to appeal. Consideration of grounds of lack of procedural fairness - consideration of Order 35, Rule 7 – application to set aside consent orders in settlement of the trial on the ground of fraud – application of Order 41, Rule 5 – factors influencing reception of fresh evidence –fresh evidence going to a ground of whether fraudulent conduct established – whether fresh evidence could have been adduced by the exercise of due diligence – whether evidence would have affected the result. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s.4; s.24(1); s.24(1A); s.25(2) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s.55 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), s.115 and s.116 Microsoft Corporation v Crosslink Marketing Group (CMG) Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1220, paras. [5] and [7] Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd [No. 1] (1980-81) 147 CLR 246 Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union v Mudginberra Station Pty Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 14 Monroe Schneider Associates (Inc.) v No. 1 Rayberem Pty Ltd (1992) 37 FCR 234 Bourke v Beneficial Finance Corp. Ltd (1993) 47 FCR 264 Wentworth v Rogers (No. 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 at p.539 Jonesco v Beard [1930] AC 298 at 301 Birch v Birch [1902] P130 at 136, 139 McHarg v Woods Radio Pty Ltd [1948] VLR 496 at 498 Ronald v Harper [1913] VLR 311 Owens Bank Ltd v Bracco [1992] 2 AC 443 Spies v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 24 NSWLR 691 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 at 293-4 Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568 at 584 and 585 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 at 492 [11], 498-9 [31] – [35] Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 at 344-5 [6] – [8] Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 at 87 and 88 Orr v Holmes (1948) 76 CLR 632 at 635, 640 Florance v Andrew (1985) 58 ALR 377 Arnotts Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1990) 24 FCR 313 MICROSOFT v CROSSLINK MARKETING GROUP (CMG) PTY LIMITED AND WALKER QUD397 OF 2005 GREENWOOD J 13 DECEMBER 2005 BRISBANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate