Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Vu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1836
MIGRATION ‑ Partner visa ‑ whether Migration Review Tribunal conducted proper review on the merits
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 359A
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Sched 2, par 820.211(2), regs 1.15A, 1.15A(3), 1.15A(3)(d)
SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 215 ALR 162 applied WAIJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 74 distinguished Nassouh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 788 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited VAN QUANG VU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL QUD 55 OF 2004 SIOPIS J 15 DECEMBER 2005 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QUD 55 OF 2004
BETWEEN: VAN QUANG VU
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SIOPIS J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 DECEMBER 2005
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1 The Migration Review Tribunal is added as the second respondent. 2 The application is dismissed. 3 The applicant is to pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QUD 55 OF 2004
BETWEEN: VAN QUANG VU
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate